Comments on: Should the US Support the International Criminal Court?

By: wildnites558

wildnites558 — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

The evidence is the …
The evidence is the UN reports that were continually written identifying the types of WMD Saddam was attempting to produce and secret deals he had with rogue countries that were sending him the raw materials. Even your beloved Democrats believed it when Bubba’s numbers were tanking in light of the Paula Jones allegations. What hard evidence do you have that Oil companies literally paid the Bush administration for a war on Iraq. There’s plenty of oil in the world we don’t need to fight for.

By: tzivyabelinfante

tzivyabelinfante — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

And one other thing …
And one other thing on your earlier comment: where did you hear about the ICC prosecuting “aggression against the environment”? To my knowledge, that is not within the ICC’s jurisdiction at all and it is not planning to incorporate it into its jurisdiction.

By: tzivyabelinfante

tzivyabelinfante — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

The question should …
The question should be: what evidence is there that Bush started a war that was really necessary? If there is no such evidence, than he must have just felt like it. Or the oil companies paid him for it. Or Cheney forced him into it. Whatever other reason there might have been, it was not a legitimate one, because there we lack the evidence.

By: wildnites558

wildnites558 — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

Yeah I know, I hear …
Yeah I know, I hear that all the time. ‘Bush just felt like starting a war’. Do you have any evidence to back up this claim? We have circumstantial evidence that in ’98 Bill Clinton bombed Iraq since his deposition to a Grand Jury on the Paula Jones case was fast approaching and he needed to bumb up his popularity in the polls based on the nasty facts and damning evidence of that incident possibly becoming known to the public. What evidence is there that Bush just felt like starting a war?

By: tzivyabelinfante

tzivyabelinfante — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

The US not …
The US not acknowledging the ICC is exemplary of their knowledge of their own war crimes. Must be embarrassing that the country that is so in love with itself for its ‘freedoms’ (since when is that word plural?) and is constantly nagging about it to other countries, is afraid of this court.

By: tzivyabelinfante

tzivyabelinfante — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

‘If Obama has to …
‘If Obama has to take military action’
Bush never HAD TO take military action, he just started a war because he felt like it (aka ‘wrong intelligence’).

By: Reverendwyotech

Reverendwyotech — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

No, well unless …
No, well unless Obama starts rounding up all the southern white people and whacking their arms off. Then Yes, but only after I lost an arm or a foot.

By: Reverendwyotech

Reverendwyotech — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

No, well unless …
No, well unless Obama starts rounding up all the southern white people and whacking their arms off. Then Yes, but only after I lost an arm or a foot.

By: wildnites558

wildnites558 — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

William Zabel is a …
William Zabel is a far-left liberal whose law fir contributes to far-left Democrats such as John Edwards, a conniving trial lawyer who made millions abusing outrageous malpractice judgements. William Zable is most definitely ***NOT*** and impartial supporter of the ICC. Another leftist Democrat with an ax to grind.

By: wildnites558

wildnites558 — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:32:20 +0000

The American courts …
The American courts work just fine thank you. Things may move slow, but we don’t need another UN-style body telling us what to do legally. “aggression against the environment” – sorry, I find this extremist. Just another International body to muck up our legal system. Leftists are all giddy about the ICC because they think it’s an alternative way to go after Cheney. Trust me, if Obama has to take military action the ICC finds unjust, the very same libs will have second thoughts about the ICC