Parent Custody Issues?
How to Win Child Custody by The Custody Coach - Proven Strategies that can Win You Custody and Save You Thousands in Attorney Costs! Overcome the learning curve of a divorce and child custody battle that can cost you a fortune and even your children!Click Here to use his expertise!
Helping keep you informed on Parent Custody issues….
mandj080708
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Personally I’d like …
Personally I’d like to see an advocate of gay marriage and gay rights on this panel. BTW I am a supporter of gay marriage. But biologically a gay couple can not have children just between the partners, that’s just a biological fact. If the courts rule that this guy has to pay the mother, in spite of their contract than lesbian couples all across this nation can forget about having a close male friend or family member agree to be their sperm doner.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
This is opening a …
This is opening a big can of worms, even if you take the homosexuality out of it. What if a guy agrees to be a sperm doner to a brother or a good friend who’s infernal, because the couple would rather it comes from a family member, rather than a random profile from a sperm bank. Is he legally accountable now. Also is the woman just looking for child support. How about shared custody, he takes the kids one week, she takes them the other week; how would she feel about that?
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
What’s at issue …
What’s at issue here is the word “Contract” Both sides agree that there was one. But as soon as it (the contract) no longer served the mothers’ “wants” voids that contract and seeks a defacto replacement that puts the sperm-doaner/father at extreme financial-legal disadvantage. This also dosen’t speak well of the Gay Marriage that preceaded this. Why was the other “gay female partner” not persued for support ? If attorney Brickman says the original contract is “not-enforcable” Then nothing is !
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Yes it’s ok to …
Yes it’s ok to donate sperm and not be financially liable.
Have you ever heard the phrase, ‘everyone doesn’t make a good parent, ‘just because you can have kids doesn’t mean that you should’, etc etc?
Why do you think people have their kids taken away? Because they’re not being a good parent or they’re not in the kids lives. This man is in his kids life and a good parent, why shouldn’t he beheld responsible when it’s HIS kid?
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Really? So it’s …
Really? So it’s okay to donate the sperm and make a baby without being financially liable, but if you want to also give and receive love, you have to pay for it? The cost of the child comes from the creation of the child, and as a sperm donor, all agree we are on the same page there. The child does not generate more costs because they are loved loved, but the love is what he is being charged for; not the sperm donation.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Where’s she live? …
Where’s she live? It’s legal to euthanize these kind of people, right? If it’s not, it should be.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
get the out of …
get the out of here this is bullshit are u serious..? the world is coming to an end wow
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Sperm donors aren’t …
Sperm donors aren’t supposed to see their kids, if he’s going to come around and get the kids emotionally attached to him and put on contract he wants to be their role model aka father he should of thought about the fact that he is being a role model to his own kids and thus being a father to the kids instead of just a sperm doner.
He simply wanted to be a dad without shelling out any money if I were the judge he’d pay.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Wow someone is …
Wow someone is bitter! LOL Please don’t generalize all Black Women b/c not all of us act like that.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
That’s what I was …
That’s what I was thinking!
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
The black woman, …
The black woman, and I’m black by the way, is the exact reason why black men walk away from their kids. She’s saying that he gets the “honor” to be a father, as if the mom is doing him a favor by letting him see the kid. All she’s saying he “he’s gotta pay, pay, pay”. And then she says his “intent is to be a father so he’s got to pay”. If he had walked away then she’d be ing about that. This is why I don’t trust them…
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Ouch.
Ouch.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Why doesn’t the non …
Why doesn’t the non custodial lesbian pay child support?
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Great, just keep on …
Great, just keep on setting legal precedent that says your state totally ignores the obligations of parties under contract law. The only natural consequence of this is people will divest economically from your state since they cannot depend on a stable and rational legal system to protect their property rights (which is the main issue at hand here)
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
I married and love …
I married and love my wife and kids but I would support some marches… Especially one against this ruling which sets an aweful precedence. Obviously a man “role model” that is old enough to be the parent is going to appear to the child as a father figure regardless of who’s the paternal father. If he referred to himself in front of the child as being his dad/father then he breached the contract of being mearly a “role model” and instead became a father. If not then the other dyke should pay.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
A contract is a …
A contract is a contract, unless it is signed by a woman.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
or -whipped …
or -whipped men.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Obviously a …
Obviously a contract means NOTHING in this example, so why would a contract between two gays matter? If they use a male donor, all they have to do is sue him for support and they’re free and clear.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
I’ll be right there …
I’ll be right there with you brother!
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Amen! Obviously …
Amen! Obviously those two lesbians aren’t fit to be parents!
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
OK, I’m all for a …
OK, I’m all for a male taking his part of the responsibility for a child he helped bring into this world…
But if you go to a sperm bank or donor then you get just that… a donor! You don’t want them in the kid’s life! When you go that route you just want that child sired and nothing more, no frills, no strings. Are blood or kidney donors responsible for checking on/taking care of the people they donated to? Are egg donors and surrogates? NO… they did YOU a favor! COME ON people!
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
the way i see it is …
the way i see it is the court shouldn’t make him pay for back child support because it’s inconclusive of how much he’s been investing in those kids. BUT he should pay child support for the simple fact that he is in the kid’s lives. Donors are donors. Fathers are fathers.
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
maybe she wasnt fit …
maybe she wasnt fit to be a mother
but i disagree with any man not being responsible for their children and leaving women to be the only one responsible
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
He should …
He should definately fight for custody and demand child support from both women!
May 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
thats why i got …
thats why i got mine and i took her to court, and won