Jean Piaget – Father of Child Psychology

A short extract of Jean Piaget the ‘Father of Child Psychology’ on french television.

FIND OUT MORE!

The following is a list of topics covered by this YouTUBE Channel:

Shared Parenting / Joint Residence Orders

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO11.html

Research Supporting Fathers Involvement in the Family

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO12.html

The Father’s Role

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO13.html

CAFCASS and the Fears and Realities of Divorce

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO14.html

Social Services and Baby ‘P’ Peter

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO15.html

Child Development

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO16.html

John Bowlby and Maternal Deprivation

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO17.html

Fathers’ Rights Issues

http://eventoddlers.atspace.com/TodVIDEO18.html

“I am very grateful to all those, like yourself who have written and particularly where you have been able to demonstrate your own thinking from the experiences you have had. Congratulations on your battle” The former Home Secretary, and dad, David Blunkett, 22 March 2005

http://www.eventoddlersneedfathers.com

Duration : 0:1:18


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses to “Jean Piaget – Father of Child Psychology”

  1. shakand Says:

    great i liked to …
    great i liked to listened his words

  2. tomazzin Says:

    (before Vygotsky’s …
    (before Vygotsky’s work was known worldwide). I agree with my being too rigid, still working on that. Sometimes it’s hard to admit other people’s genius when you don’t agree with their ideas; as when a lot of people disagree with Watson’s or Skinner’s genius. Yes, he was probably a Genius, still that’s a word too rigid with criteria too blurry to determine its proper use.

  3. evenToddlers Says:

    I think he was a …
    I think he was a genius. I think he gave us the categories but that it is other people that interpret his work too rigidly. He provided the framework for understanding which would lead to the new discipline of Child Psychology.

  4. tomazzin Says:

    I totally agree …
    I totally agree with most of what you say. I think, though, that everyone has standards based on personal interpretations. I like to think in continua, I think that everything in the world is continuous. There are social criteria for putting labels on things, as perceptual thresholds, for instance. I don’t think of piaget as a genius because I think he was too rigid with his criteria. How many (discrete) concrete operations must I solve in order to be in that particular stage? Who cares, I’m 22.

  5. ccaldero Says:

    P.S. You are …
    P.S. You are probably a smart guy too (most people think in terms of categories, not continua), but not a genius, by your own definition. You classify people into genius/not-genius based on categories, not continua (“geniuses think in continua, not in stages…”).

  6. ccaldero Says:

    Piaget was probably …
    Piaget was probably a genius because he was writing peer-reviewed articles before he could even go to college. Some things cannot be studied as continua (e.g., sometimes we’re interested in knowing whether an infant can speak 1 word or zero words, walk or not). There may be underlying processes that can be studied as continua, which may be related to Piaget’s stages, but that doesn’t diminish the genius of Piaget for realizing that certain cognitive abilities are not present at different ages.

  7. tomazzin Says:

    Smart guy, I’m not …
    Smart guy, I’m not sure if a genius. Geniuses think in continua, not in stages…

  8. crazypianolady Says:

    I agree. A genius.
    I agree. A genius.

  9. ladyxeona Says:

    genius.
    genius.

Leave a Reply